A few days ago, a comedian with cerebral palsy and who
cannot speak won Britain’s Got Talent 2018 – and the runner-up was a comedian
with Asperger’s syndrome. (I know my last blog post was about BGT too, but
would you believe I haven’t actually watched it - except the two men I'm talking about here.) Some people are talking as if this
is a watershed moment for disability, but I'm wondering whether we’ll look back in years to
come and feel uncomfortable about what has happened. Should we be laughing about disablism and disability?
Disabled people can get a pretty raw deal at times; I am
able-bodied (now), but I spent most of my twenties in a wheelchair and in pain,
and so I have first-hand experience of some of the obstacles (both literal and
figurative) that disabled people must overcome. There is some debate surrounding whether autism is a disability (cerebral palsy is recognised as one) but for now I’ll sidestep this debate and just talk about both men as being disabled.
Disablism exists, and disabled people are largely excluded from TV
and positions of power. So on the one hand, it’s great to see that disabled people are
getting some air-time on a prime-time talent show. Decades ago, this simply would
not have happened, so that’s progress. It’s also progress that the voters – who
decided the winners of the show – have voted a disabled comedian to win the
show.
What made bothered me slightly was that the winner –
the Lost Voice Guy – made so many jokes about his disability. (This was true of
the runner-up Robert White to a far lesser extent, although he did make some
jokes about his social awkwardness.) Winner Lee Ridley’s cerebral palsy means
that he is unable to speak, and he used a voice synthesiser to tell his jokes
on stage. Many of his jokes centred around his disability: his voice
synthesiser sounds like the “Cashier number four please” voice you hear at the
post office; someone on the bus wanted him to give up his seat as another person was more
disabled; people asking him “what’s wrong with you?”; his mum and dad still
wondering whether his first word will be ‘mummy’ or ‘daddy’… the list goes on. Even
his T-shirts sported captions such as “I’m in it for the parking”. His jokes
were funny, and I found myself laughing along with the audience, thinking the
guy was a really good comedian, but his routine should give us pause
for thought.
If disabled people were treated fairly and disablism didn't exist, then this sort of routine wouldn’t be possible. Many of his jokes
revolved around the ways in which he’s been treated negatively, discriminated against,
and the obstacles he faces, and people might suggest that it’s good that he can
‘see the funny side’ of his disability and disablism by sending himself up, but experiencing disablism is not something anyone should have
to see the funny side of.
A few decades back, when people of colour were first ‘allowed’
to perform comedy for a mainly white audience in the UK and US, it wasn’t
uncommon for their routine to include jokes about their race, or racism they’ve faced.
People laughed about it then, but I think we’d feel pretty uncomfortable now
listening to a black person joke about their fear of getting shot by a police
officer and suchlike. We feel uncomfortable because we think that racism
shouldn’t happen, and laughing about it trivialises it. So the fact that the Lost
Voice Guy can have people in stitches with jokes about his disability and
disablism might not be the watershed moment that it seems to be. Nonetheless, it might be a step forward. For a long time,
people of colour weren’t part of the comedy scene in the UK and US, and now
they are – and so that transitionary period where they made jokes about their
skin colour may have been a first awkward step forward towards acceptance. But a
black comedian who is popular because he makes jokes about a range of topics
(or a particular topic, such as politics or sport) would surely be preferable
to a black comedian who makes jokes about the racism he faces on a daily basis.
(Note that I’m not saying that people should keep quiet about the racism they experience; I’m saying
that the racism shouldn’t happen in the first place.) Similarly, disabled
comedians who continually joke about their disability and disablism are, for me
at least, an awkward first step towards a time when we can hopefully accept a
disabled comedian not because he makes funny jokes about disability, but because
he makes funny jokes about all kinds of things.
Some might say that I am being overly defensive, and that I should
lighten up – after all, the Lost Voice Guy (presumably!) wrote the self-deprecating jokes himself, and the
audience liked the routine, so why am I putting a downer on it all? The reason why is
that disablism is a daily reality for many people, and being on the receiving
end is a humiliating and soul-destroying experience. I am in no way a criticising
the Lost Voice Guy (or Robert White), because comedy can be a way of regaining
control over a situation and dealing with negative treatment, not to mention a
way of drawing people’s attention to the fact that (a) disablism exists, and
(b) disabled people are in many ways that really matter, just normal people. I think
that disabled comedians should be allowed to joke about their experiences if they want to, but
what we should take away from it all is a harsher message: jokes about
disablism are only possible because disablism exists. We should work towards
ending disablism, not just laughing about it.
No comments:
Post a Comment